Reference Library

AI Disclosure Resources

Primary source documents from Australian courts, tribunals, and government bodies. All links go directly to official sources.

Fair Work Commission

New South Wales

South Australia

Victoria

Federal Court of Australia

Standards & Government

Key Cases

Notable Australian decisions involving AI use in legal proceedings.

Valu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2025] FedCFamC2G 95

Lawyer referred to the NSW Legal Services Commissioner after submitting court documents containing AI-generated, non-existent case citations drafted with ChatGPT.

Pennisi [2026] FWC

FWC rejected a 53-page AI-generated general protections application. The submissions contained non-existent case law, and contentions changed and evolved with each repetition throughout the material.

Deysel v Electra Lift Co. [FWC]

ChatGPT assisted an applicant in bringing a general protections application against a former employer, but failed to flag the 21-day filing deadline. The claim was filed approximately 2.5 years late.

Riley v Nuvei Australia Merchant Services Pty Ltd [2026] FWC

Applicant admitted to using a 'legally trained' AI tool. The FWC identified that some cited case law were fake. The Commission noted that particular legal principles or authorities may have been AI hallucinations.

Luck v Secretary, Services Australia [2025] FCAFC 26

The Full Federal Court redacted a false case citation from its reasons, noting it 'may be a product of hallucination by a large language model' and taking steps to prevent the false information from being propagated further.

Need help understanding these requirements?

The Evidence Disclosure Standard provides a structured framework for meeting AI disclosure obligations across all Australian jurisdictions.